My Photo

November 2015

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
Blog powered by Typepad

« The Flight to Mars Palette and the Autumn/Winter 2012-13 Collections | Main | Of Ziggurats and Wall Dresses: Time to Bring Back Cinzia Ruggeri? »

March 03, 2012


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


Perhaps V&A sold a license of the image, or the Prado in the case of Bosch? The Met and Phaedon have similar systems.


Thank you so much for your suggestion. That may be an option in some cases, even though selling a license may depend on what you're going to do with that specific image (are you going to print it on a postcard or a notebook for personal or commercial uses or are you going to sell Haute Couture dresses with that print?); but in Dries Van Noten's case he took the pictures and then re-worked them, so I wonder are we all allowed to do it from now on? Can we all ask a museum to take our own images of something in their own archives and then use these images for commercial purposes? Maybe somebody working in a museum can help us finding the answer!

Screen printing oklahoma city

I don't know what to say. This is definitely one of the better blogs Ive read. You're so insightful, have so much real stuff to bring to the table. I hope that more people read this and get what I got from it: chills. Great job and great blog. I cant wait to read more.

The comments to this entry are closed.